THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XI, Issue # 20, January 17, 2009
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
"JUST SAY NO" TO OIL & NATURAL GAS REVENUES?
By Paul K. Driessen
THE ENVIRONMENTALIST MOVEMENT, UNITED STATES ENERGY & ECONOMIC POLICY, & THE CONDITION OF THE
AMERICAN ECONOMY: SHOULD THE U.S. GOVERNMENT PROHIBIT FURTHER EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT OF
AMERICA'S DOMESTIC OIL & NATURAL GAS RESERVES? SHOULD THE U.S.A. PASS UP THE OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN
ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT REVENUES BY EXPANDING DOMESTIC PETROLEUM PRODUCTION? HOW BANS ON
INCREASED PETROLEUM PRODUCTION COST AMERICA BILLIONS THAT COULD PAY FOR ECONOMIC STIMULOUS PLANS &
DEVELOPMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES -- THE REAL LESSONS OF THE JANUARY, 1969, SANTA BARBARA
BLOWOUT
FULL STORY:
Plummeting stock and housing prices have triggered a painful recession, America’s worst job losses since 1945, and
trillions in lost national wealth.
California is grappling with a $42-billion budget deficit. That’s more than the GDP of 112 countries. Maryland, Virginia,
New York, and other states likewise face billion-dollar budget shortfalls.
Congress and the White House want a $1-trillion “stimulus” for the banking, auto and steel industries, roads, bridges
and ports, and “worthy” projects like water parks, parking garages, and fitness centers.
They also support expanded renewable energy programs that will require tens of billions in subsidies and tax breaks –
but provide intermittent electricity and deliver only 5-15% of their “rated capacity” during peak Summer demand periods.
Many states have oil, natural gas, coal, uranium and other energy and mineral resources, within their borders or off their
coasts. Development would produce critically needed energy, reduce oil and natural gas imports, create millions of jobs,
buttress our national security, and generate trillions of dollars in lease bonus, rent, royalty and tax revenues, to help
pay these bills.
California could nearly double its offshore oil production within 12 - 18 months, without installing a single new platform,
by using directional drilling technology to bore more wells from existing platforms.
But environmentalists vigorously oppose development. Many states increasingly restrict exploration and production.
The U.S. Senate is considering bills that would place more energy prospects off limits. Many legislators want a
permanent lock on billions of barrels of oil beneath Alaska’s North Slope and America’s Outer Continental Shelf –
despite support for drilling by two-thirds of voters.
Onshore, the usual justification is speculative or exaggerated impacts on wildlife, habitats, and groundwater from drilling
and production. Offshore, the most common rationale is the infamous oil blowout that occurred forty years ago this
month, off Santa Barbara.
That spill is the only one in over 45,000 U.S. offshore wells, where significant amounts of oil reached our coasts. And
it never would have happened, if it weren’t for the incompetence of a few federal regulators and oil company officials.
The guilty well was being drilled into brittle, highly fractured rock formations which sit atop a more stable zone that
holds billions of gallons of gooey crude oil, mixed with natural gas under high pressure. It’s the same oil that’s been
seeping out of the shallow formations and washing up on California beaches since long before Spanish explorers
used it to waterproof their galleons.
But having drilled several wells without incident, company officials requested a waiver from normal regulations.
Unbelievably, it was granted. The drill crew was allowed to install minimal well casing – steel pipes that go into well
bores to prevent blowouts.
When oil and gas began to erupt out of the deep drill hole, the crew’s quick response stopped it only temporarily.
Because the casing didn’t go deep enough, the pressurized goo surged into the brittle rocks, creating huge gashes
that sent gushers of oil out around the platform. For six days, favorable winds kept the oil slick offshore. Then the
wind shifted.
Oil inundated Santa Barbara’s gorgeous beaches. Thousands of sea birds died, along with seals and countless other
marine animals. The anti-oil environmentalist movement was born.
Thankfully, dire predictions of permanent damage were wrong. Bird, crab, lobster, seal, and other populations soon
rebounded. Under the platform, the magnificent artificial reef ecosystem returned.
Enormous mussels, scallops, and barnacles again cover the huge scaffold that holds the production platform above
the waves. Gorging on shellfish, and having to move mere inches for their next meal, starfish grow to three feet across.
Oriental carpets of white, pink, and lavender sponges and sea anemones create firework displays of color, while crabs
scamper about and thousands of mackerel, sardines, and other fish cruise by.
I know this, because I’ve been there, up close and in person, in scuba gear, beneath that very platform and a dozen
others in the Santa Barbara Channel and Gulf of Mexico. I joined biologists, wrote professional papers, and produced
a documentary film about these towering steel reefs.
Even more important, the technologies, regulations, and enforcement programs have changed. Today, instruments
monitor temperature and pressure in wells 24/7. Blowout preventers, pipeline shutoff valves, and other devices on or
beneath the sea floor control the flow of oil and natural gas. Offshore operators conduct regular accident training and
safety exercises. The efforts have paid off.
In 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita pounded the Gulf of Mexico’s 3,000 drilling rigs and production platforms. Over
200 were damaged or destroyed. But virtually no oil or natural gas escaped.
In fact, according to the U.S. Minerals Management Service (where I used to work), oil companies produced nearly 12
billion barrels of oil from OCS leases between 1980 and 2007. Only 102,000 barrels were spilled: 3,780 barrels a year, on
average. That’s a 99.999% safety record.
By contrast, natural seeps, like the ones off California, leak 620,000 barrels of oil per year into U.S. waters. America’s
oil industry has a pollution record 164 times better than Mother Nature’s!
And producing more U.S. offshore oil has an added bonus. It means there is less seepage, and thus less oil in our
oceans and on our beaches.
Our energy policies should recognize these facts.
America has been held hostage far too long by anti-oil ideologues and foreign “oiligarchs.”
Keeping our vast resources off limits won’t convince consumers to slash petroleum use. We will just import more, and
be ever more indebted to foreign powers. (At $50 per barrel, imported oil costs the United States $235 billion per year;
at $140 per barrel, we send $650 billion annually overseas.)
Oil prices are low at the moment, because world demand is down, due to the global recession. We could keep them
down, by prolonging the recession – an unpalatable option. Or we can help keep prices at tolerable levels, by
developing the domestic oil and natural gas that we have in abundance, but politicians, courts and Greens, for too
long, have told us we can’t touch.
We need the energy, jobs, and revenues that offshore (and onshore) oil and natural gas development can provide. We
can no longer afford to “just say no” to domestic petroleum, during the long transition to future energy technologies
that we cannot begin to envision – any more than even Jules Verne could have foreseen the wondrous energy and
other technologies that creative minds have made a reality today.
That’s the kind of change we can believe in. The kind America needs.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality and Committee For A Constructive
Tomorrow, and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power · Black Death.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XI, 2009
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity