THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume XIII, Issue # 202, August 16, 2011
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
DAVID SUZUKI INSULTS, BUT WON'T DEBATE.
As the Climate Scare Fizzles, Canada's Celebrity
Environmentalist Resorts to Ad Hominem Attacks.
By Dr. David Legates
ENVIRONMENTALISTS, TRUE SCIENTISTS, & GLOBAL WARMING THEORY: TRUE SCIENTISTS GETTING THE RECORD
STRAIGHT -- SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INTO THE ROLE OF THE SUN IN CLIMATE CHANGE -- GREATER & GREATER AWARENESS
THAT THE INFLUENCE OF CARBON DIOXIDE ON CLIMATE CHANGE IS FAR LESS THAN THAT CLAIMED BY THE
ENVIRONMENTALISTS -- MORE & MORE PEOPLE DISMISSING ENVIRONMENTALIST PROPAGANDA ABOUT THE THREAT OF
GLOBAL WARMING CATACLYSMS -- THE ENVIRONMENTALIST MOVEMENT & RADICAL ACTIVIST ADVOCACY SCIENTISTS
RESORTING TO CENSORSHIP & INCREASINGLY VICIOUS PERSONAL ATTACKS ON TRUE SCIENTISTS, WHO DISAGREE WITH
THE CATASTROPHIC CLIMATE CHANGE THESIS
FULL STORY:
Dr. David Takayoshi Suzuki, Canadian academic, environmentalist ideologue and political activist, has never met,
debated, or even spoken with my colleague, scientist Dr. Willie Wei-Hock Soon. But, as more people dismiss Dr.
Suzuki’s scare stories about global warming cataclysms, Suzuki has resorted to personal attacks against Dr. Soon and
others who disagree with him.
Dr. Soon’s brilliant research into the sun’s role in climate change has helped make millions aware that the influence of
carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere is far less than Suzuki wants them to think. In a recent column that was picked
up by the Huffington Post and other media outlets, Suzuki attacked Dr. Soon, mostly with a recycled Greenpeace
“investigation” that is itself nothing more than a rehash of tiresome (and libelous) misstatements, red herrings, and
outright lies. It’s time to set the record straight.
First, the alleged corporate cash. Suzuki claims Dr. Soon received “more than $1 million over the past decade” from U.S.
energy companies, and implies that Dr. Soon lied to a U.S. Senate committee about the funding. In fact, the research
grants were received in the years following the Senate hearing; the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics took
nearly half of the money (for “administration”), and what was left covered Dr. Soon’s salary, research, and other
expenses, including even toner for his printer.
By comparison, the Suzuki Foundation spends some $7 million every year on its “educational” and pressure campaigns
– many of them in conjunction with various PR agencies, renewable energy companies, other foundations and
environmentalist activist groups. They all stand to profit handsomely from Suzuki’s causes, especially “catastrophic
climate change” and campaigns to replace “harmful” fossil fuels with subsidized, land-intensive, low-energy-output,
“eco-friendly” wind and solar facilities.
Under another convoluted arrangement, the Suzuki Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Gordon and
Betty Moore Foundation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, University of Alberta,
US-based SeaWeb, and other organizations provided or divvied up some $23 million, to promote an anti-fish-farming
campaign. The years-long effort suddenly and inexplicably ended, and all traces of it disappeared from the Suzuki
Foundation website, after Vancouver-based researcher Vivian Krause raised serious questions about its claims.
And, yet, Suzuki is criticizing Dr. Soon, while alarmist climate catastrophe researchers share over $6 billion annually in
U.S. and Canadian taxpayer money, and millions more in corporate cash, to link every natural phenomenon to global
warming and promote renewable “alternatives” to fossil fuels.
If it is wrong to receive grants from organizations that have taken “advocacy” positions, then virtually every scientist
with whom Suzuki has associated would be guilty. Even Suzuki recognizes this. “We should look at the science, and not
at who is paying for the research,” he wrote recently.
But, if he truly believes real science must stand or fall on its own merits, not on the source of its funding, why does he
insist on double standards and continue to attack Dr. Soon over his funding sources?
Second, Suzuki repeats an absurd Greenpeace claim that Dr. Soon tried to “undermine” the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change’s “peer-reviewed” work. In reality, scientists are required to examine, review, and even criticize other
scientists’ research, especially when it is used to justify slashing the hydrocarbon energy on which our jobs, living
standards, and Civilization depend. In reality, the IPCC solicits reviews of its publications, but is under no obligation to
address any criticisms that scientists raise, in contrast to the normal peer-review process.
Moreover, the IPCC refuses to conduct its own quality control, and repeatedly promotes scare stories about rising seas,
melting Himalayan glaciers, disappearing Amazon rainforests, more severe storms and droughts, and other disasters. By
now, anyone familiar with the Climategate and IPCC scandals knows these headline-grabbing claims are based on
nothing more than exaggerated computer model outputs, deliberate exclusion of contrary findings, questionable air
temperature station locations, and even “research” by environmentalist activists.
Third, Suzuki’s most egregious distortion of reality involves the Climate Research journal’s handling of two
papers by Drs. Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas, regarding solar links to climate change. The publisher concluded that the
manuscript editor had “properly analyzed the evaluations and requested appropriate revisions,” and the authors
“revised their manuscripts accordingly.”
However, when Dr. Hans von Storch became Editor-in-Chief, he circulated a hurriedly written editorial declaring that the
review process had failed, and the Soon-Baliunas manuscripts should not have been published, due to alleged
“methodological flaws.” He intended to publish the editorial prior to a U.S. Senate committee hearing, thereby
discrediting Dr. Soon. Hans von Storch even asserted that Soon and Baliunas should be barred from publishing again in
Climate Research – a disciplinary action usually levied only for convictions of plagiarism or fraud.
The publisher refused to publish the editorial until the editorial board could be consulted – which meant after the hearing.
So von Storch and other editors and review editors resigned. Senator Jeffords highlighted the resignations during the
hearing. But fortunately, I was a hearing witness and provided a correct account.
Nevertheless, after the hearing, the publisher changed his mind and said the Soon-Baliunas paper should not have been
published. I resigned as review editor, because I felt the journal had succumbed to pressure from environmentalists and
radical activist scientists and was no longer an unbiased outlet for healthy climate change debates.
Climategate made it clear that the truth was even worse. The emails paint a vivid picture of advocacy scientists
strong-arming the publisher, threatening to destroy Climate Research by boycotting the journal, and intimidating
or colluding with editors and grant program officers to channel funding to alarmists, publish only their work, and reject
funding requests and publications from any scientists who disagreed with them on global warming chaos. Suzuki’s
increasingly strident and desperate attacks mirror their campaign, as do Al Gore’s – and no wonder.
The global warming scare has fizzled. The sun has entered a new “quiet” phase, and average global temperatures have
been stable for 15 years. Climate conferences in Copenhagen and elsewhere have gone nowhere. Kyoto has become little
more than a footnote in history. Countries that agreed to “climate stabilization” policies are retreating from that untenable
position. The public realizes that climate science is far from “settled.” The climate-chaos religion is about to go the way
of Baal-worship.
Most important, Canadians, Americans, and Europeans alike are beginning to realize that the real dangers are not from
global warming.
They are from potentially cooler global temperatures that could hamstring agriculture, and from government (and
Suzuki-advocated) policies that are driving energy prices so high that companies are sending jobs to Asia, and millions
of families can no longer afford to heat and cool their homes, drive their cars, or pay for electricity that powers all the
wondrous technologies that make our lives infinitely better, safer, and healthier than even kings and queens enjoyed
just a century ago.
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
The Earth's Natural History, Global Climate Changes,
& the Future of Human Life & Civilization on the Planet:
Science, Ideology, & Public Policy
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Dr. David R. Legates is Professor of Climatology at the University of Delaware and a former review editor for the journal
Climate Research. He has worked with Dr. Willie Soon since they were the first to uncover the flaws in the
socalled ‘Hockey Stick’ in 2002.
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume XIII, 2011
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity