WINNING THE BATTLE AGAINST AL-QA'IDA,
LOSING THE WAR AGAINST JIHAD
By Raymond Ibrahim
As we approach the ten-year anniversary of 9/11, we win another battle with the recent slaying of al-Qa'ida's number 2. According to the Associated Press, "U.S. and Pakistani officials said Saturday that al-Qa'ida's second-in-command, Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, has been killed in Pakistan, delivering another big blow to a terrorist group that the U.S. believes to be on the verge of defeat."
Splendid news. However, some context:
Before Osama bin Laden, the face of al-Qa'ida, was killed, it made sense to announce, by way of prelude, the killing of various al-Qa'ida members, such as Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, Abu Ayub al-Masri , Abu Laith al-Libi, the notorious Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, and any number of other "Abus" (and "Ibns"); it also made sense to exult, even if with hyperbolic headlines "al-Qa'ida receives devastating blow" by way of saying the noose is tightening around bin Laden, who was next.
However, with the killing of bin Laden the snakes head, the face of terror, the heart of al-Qa'ida it is becoming a bit redundant for the U.S. government to continue boasting over the killing of yet one more al-Qa'ida member; just as it is redundant to continue asserting that al-Qa'ida is on the "verge of defeat."
After all, any number of analysts insisted that, with the killing of bin Laden, al-Qa'ida was as good as dead, thereby implying that, whether this or that member gets killed, is irrelevant. Peter Bergen, for example, declared that "Killing bin Laden is the end of the war on terror. We can just sort of announce that right now . It's time to move on."
More to the point: the Obama administration's inordinate focus and optimism over the killing of the latest al-Qa'ida member (one can place past and future names here ___) ultimately exposes its myopic approach an approach that tries to localize the problem, to give it a face, to treat it as a temporal and tangible entity that can be defeated through arms.
The unfortunate fact is that, even if al-Qa'ida were totally eradicated tomorrow, the terror threat to the West would hardly recede, since al-Qa'ida has never been the source of the threat, but simply one of its manifestations. The AP report obliquely reflects this: "Senior al-Qa'ida figures have been killed before, only to be replaced," even as the Obama administration is optimistic that "victory" is at hand.
To get a better perspective on the overall significance of the latest killing of an al-Qa'ida member, consider how, at the turn of the Twentieth Century, the Islamic world was rushing to emulate the victorious and confident West best exemplified by the Ottoman Empire itself, the preserver and enforcer of Islam, rejecting its Muslim past and embracing secularism under Ataturk. Today, 100 years later, the Muslim world has largely rejected secularism and is reclaiming its Islamic including jihadist heritage, lashing out in a manifold of ways.
Consider how many Islamist leaders, organizations, and terrorists have come and gone in the Twentieth Century alone many killed like bin Laden only for the conflict between Islam and the West to continue growing by the day.
It's in this context that the Obama administration audaciously evokes the word "victory," simply because yet another jihadist has been killed.
This, of course, is to be expected, considering the Obama administration, which has a tendency to censor words and thus knowledge concerning the nature of the threat, just released a much vaunted policy paper on countering terrorism that never once uses the word "Islam," Islamism" or "radical Islam," while myopically fixating on al-Qa'ida, one of countless jihadist organizations that seek to subjugate the West.
Despite its narrow approach, the Obama administration itself has inadvertently conceded to the existential nature of the threat, as it has begun to acknowledge that lone wolf terrorists jihadists who have no connection to al-Qa'ida, other than that they share the same worldview are a greater threat.
As Attorney General Eric Holder put it, "the threat has changed to worrying about people in the United States, American citizens raised here, born here, and who, for whatever reason, have decided that they are going to become radicalized and take up arms against the nation in which they were born."
Note how Holder ignores the most important factor to understanding and ultimately defeating jihadists their motivation by dismissing it as "whatever reason." Even so, the Obama administration's acknowledgement of the lone wolf jihadist proves one thing: it is doctrinal ideologies floating among Muslims around the world not just the caves of al-Qa'ida that create terror threats.
So when Counterterrorism chief John Brennan says that "Taking him out of commission is huge. There's not another bin Laden out there. I don't know if there's another Atiyah Abd al-Rahman out there" he can rest assured that, while those two are gone, countless are the no-names out to emulate them, in a myriad of ways.
To conclude, by all means, target and kill terrorists, singly and collectively, and rejoice over it; but keep in mind that, even if al-Qa'ida were expunged from existence, while that would be a battle well won, it would not be the end of the war, which has been prosecuted in various forms and frequencies for fourteen centuries, and will not end with the elimination of this or that individual or organization.
Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three Page Two Page One
Middle East -- Arabs, Arab States,
& Their Middle Eastern Neighbors
American Foreign Policy -- The Middle East
International Politics & World Disorder:
War, Peace, & Geopolitics in the Real World:
Foreign Affairs & U.S. National Security
Page Two Page One
Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.
Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization
Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Counterterrorism & U.S. National Security
U.S. National Security Strategy
Raymond Ibrahim, a historian of Islam, Islamism and the Middle East, is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, an Associate Director of the Middle East Forum, a guest lecturer at the National Defense Intelligence College, and the editor of The Al-Qa'ida Reader, a collection of tranlations of key texts and documents of the Islamist movement. Ibrahim's translations of the religious texts and political propaganda comprising this collection help readers comprehend the origins, development, history, and serious danger of the Islamist war doctrines of Usama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, the Founders of Al-Qa'ida.
The foregoing article by Raymond Ibrahim was originally published in Pajamas Media, September 12, 2011, and can be found on the Internet website maintained by the Middle East Forum, a foreign policy think tank which seeks to define and promote American interests in the Middle East, defining U.S. interests to include fighting radical Islam, working for Palestinian Arab acceptance of the State of Israel, improving the management of U.S. efforts to promote constitutional democracy in the Middle East, reducing America's energy dependence on the Middle East, more robustly asserting U.S. interests vis-à-vis Saudi Arabia, and countering the Iranian threat. (URL: http://www.meforum.org/3037/battle-al-qaeda-jihad)
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Germany * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration * Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control
Africa: Black Africa *
Africa: North Africa *
American Government 1
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor