An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume V, Issue # 58, March 15, 2003
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

By Ariel Nathan Pasko

Scorecard: Israel 1, Arab States 0. That about sums it up.

Israel just had elections recently and three Arab-led parties won 9 seats in the Knesset-- Israel's parliament. Constitutional democracy, I was told when I was growing up, meant majority rule with respect for minority rights. Israel, more or less qualifies. Let's take a look at a few other examples.

Iraq not too long ago had elections and guess what, Saddam Hussein, running without opposition, was elected by 100% of the electorate. Even people in the hospital, "deep in coma" came out to vote for him. Same thing for Syria's Hafez Assad a few years ago. Running unopposed, he garnered 99% of the vote. Gee, they sure love those Arab des- pots, don't they?

Take Lebanon for example. Poor things, the Lebanese "invited" Syria in to "help" them during the civil war in 1976, and the Syrians never left. Ever since, Syria has been sort of like an obnoxious guest who overstays his visit, not sensing when its time to leave. The Christians in Lebanon feel that way. That's Syria, well-known "champion of democracy," respected member of the United Nations Security Council, and rapacious occupier of Lebanon in violation of UN Resolution 520 (telling them to get out), I might add.

Syria, that's that country run by the Alawis (a heretical offshoot of Shiite Islam), of which Bashir and the rest of the Assad clan are members. Although they make up only 10-12% of the population, about the same amount as Christians, and far fewer than the about 75% Sunni Muslim majority, they rule with an "iron fist." The Sunnis might be the ma- jority, but when the now deceased Hafez Assad destroyed a town (Hama, 1982) killing 20,000 people, to root out his political opposition (a few hundred members of the Muslim Brotherhood), well hey, so who cares about beinga majority, right? Although about 90% of the population is ethnically Arab, with the remainder Kurd, Armenian, and others, Alawi affirmative action proves, minority rights are doing fine in Syria. Democracy is democracy!

Iraq isn't much different. It's run by the Tikritis--sons of the town of Tikrit, as most everybody who has been following the Iraq adventure probably already knows. Saddam Hussein, his advisors, top Baath Party leaders, and most military and security leaders all come from there, a town of about 100,000 out of a country of 23 million. Talk about a company town, this one's a town-run country. Saddam and his cronies are Sunni Mus- lims, that make up only about 35% of the population, in contrast to the about 62% Shiite majority of Iraq. Minority rights win again.

Or look at Jordan, that well-known "modern" Middle East kingdom. Parliament was suspended and political parties were banned for over three decades. Political parties were first re-legalized in 1992. After years of promised "creeping democratization" un- der the now deceased King Hussein (friend of Yitzhak Rabin and "peace" and formerly builder of latrines in Eastern Jerusalem out of Jewish gravestones), his son the en- lightened, Western educated King Abdullah II (who became king in 1999), suspended parliament in June, 2001. Elections have been postponed ever since. Over 100 emer- gency regulations (i.e., anti-constitutional and anti-democratic laws) have been enacted, including the suspension of press freedoms. But, don't worry, everything's been done according to the constitution. Right?

The ruling Hashemite Dynasty, I remind you, decedents of Abdullah I, are natives of Hejaz, not Transjordan. The Saud family booted them out in the early part of the 20th century. So, they moved to the Palestine Mandate area and, under British perfidy, es- tablished a new kingdom in Transjordan.

Then there's Egypt, a nice place, as long as you're not a Coptic Christian. For over 50 years, Egypt, has been ruled by only three presidents. Nasser and Sadat were members of the Free Officers Movement revolt of 1952. Mubarak was Sadat's vice president from the National Democratic Party that Sadat established in 1977. In Egyptian democracy, the president is nominated by the NDP-dominated People's Assembly, and then ratified (unchallenged) by popular referendum. Mubarak was reelected in 1999 by about the same amount, 95%, as he's "won" by for three previous 6-year terms. Surprised?

Elections might not be all that free in Egypt, but there is plenty of media freedom--that is, for anti-Semitism and Israel-bashing, all in violation of the 1979 Peace Treaty with Israel. But what can you do, democracy is democracy.

Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, and several North African states don't even try to pre- tend. They are honest in their opposition to Western-style constitutional democratic gov- ernment. Usually taking the position that constitutional democracy, pluralism, and toler- ance are alien to their Arabic cultures and Islamic inclinations.

All joking aside, with the "upcoming" war (if it takes place), the United States is promis- ing a "regime change" and a democratization process in Iraq. The Bush administration wants to promote constitutional democracy throughout the Middle East; it just dedicated $145 million to a project called the Middle East Partnership Initiative. President Bush for example has called for constitutional democratic reforms in the Palestinian Authority before Palestinian statehood is allowed. Taking the cue, Syria has recently publicized a withdrawal--"cosmetic redeployment" to some--of troops in Lebanon. Even Saudi Arabia has hinted that, after another Gulf War, reform will be on the way. But for some thinkers in the U.S.A., the real question being debated is whether the U.S.A. should forcibly ex- port constitutional democracy to the Middle East, instead of waiting for the Arab re- gimes to institute it on their own.

There are plenty of minorities in the Arab world, North Africa, and the Middle East that await real constitutional democracy. There are Lebanese who suffer daily occupation under a vicious Syrian regime. There are Kurds throughout the Middle East and Assyrians in Iraq, peoples who aspire to independence. There are Berbers (the pre-Arab indigenous population) in North Africa who after 11 centuries, still resist Arabization. There are Christians in Egypt who are attacked by Islamic radicals and persecuted. There are Christians and Animists in the Sudan who resist slavery or Islamicization. And so on and so on. All are non-Arab or non-Muslim minorities, who long for the United States to bring regime change to their area too. [See Minorities in the Middle East: A History of Struggle and Self-Expression, by Mordechai Nisan, and The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians under Islam, by Bat Ye'or, to get a better sense of the problems.]

This brings us to the most serious measure of how committed to constitutional democrat- ic reform in the Middle East anyone is, the Israeli-Palestinian issue. The Quartet (the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, and Russia) is promoting a "roadmap" to peace, with the promise of Palestinian statehood. Recently their Task Force on Palestinian Reform met in London, but only the U.S.A. has been demanding any real constitutional democratic reforms in the Palestinian Authority, and only halfhearted- ly, at that. The Europeans seem to be more interested in financial accountability for their aid money than constitutional democratic political reform in the Palestinian Authority.

According to "global common knowledge," Jewish "settlements" in the "West Bank and Gaza" will have to be abandoned, and Jews transferred, voluntarily or forcibly, back to the new borders of the State of Israel.

I ask a simple question, WHY?

Ethnic cleansing was condemned throughout the 1990's. Bosnia's power-sharing govern- ment is a case in point. After the breakup of Yugoslavia and the war that followed, the European Union, NATO and the U.S.A. did not help to establish an exclusively Muslim state in Bosnia, but one where Croats and Serbs were included. The 4th Geneva Con- vention (meant to protect residents from forced expulsion) was adopted after World War II, with the Holocaust in mind. How could the U.S.A. or the Europeans be thinking of making parts of the historic Jewish homeland JUDENREIN?

If the Palestinian state in the making is to claim the mantle of CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, there would be no better test of its tolerance of minorities than the granting of citizenship to Jews who chose to remain in their towns, villages, and homes in Judea and Samaria (the "West Bank"), and Gaza. Without extending full, equal rights and privileges to Jews in Palestine, including the possibility of being elected to the parliament and serving in the Palestinian government, rights Arab citizens of Israel have, constitutional democracy and internal peace and order become empty expressions.

So what will it be? Are we going to stop hearing calls for the closing down of Jewish "settlements," that is, forced abandonment and destruction of Jewish cities, towns, and villages? Are we going to stop hearing calls for the expulsion of several hundred thou- sand Jews from their homes? Or will we now know, that "regime change" and CONSTI- TUTIONAL DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST are just empty slogans bereft of all meaning?


The Israeli-Arab Conflict

More on the Israeli-Arab Conflict

The Middle East & the Arabs

Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism

More on Radical Islam & Islamic Terrorism

War & Peace in the Real World

Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.

Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization

Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies

U.S. National Security Strategy

Ariel Natan Pasko is an independent analyst & consultant. He has a Master's Degree in International Relations & Policy Analysis. His articles appear regularly on numerous news/views and think-tank websites and in newspapers.

Copyright 2003 SierraTimes.Com

Reprinted with Permission of SierraTimes.Com
Reprinted from SierraTimes.Com
February 27, 2003


Return to Top of Page

Return to Beginning of
Public Issues & Political Controversies

Return to Beginning of
Volume V, 2003

Return to Beginning of
Subject Matter Highlights



Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control

This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy




An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues

Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity