THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume V, Issue # 70, March 17, 2003
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

LIBERAL LEFTISTS & THE WAR WITH IRAQ: LIBERAL LEFTISTS
PUT THEIR FINGERS TO THE WIND
By Paul Walfield

How can you be true to your "convictions," against a war," and still be a loyal, patriotic American? 

Well, you let everyone know that when the shooting starts, you will do a 180, and be for the war, er, the troops.  Being a Liberal has to be the hardest job in America, as opposed to being a Liberal in Europe, which has to be the easiest job on the planet.

In the U.S.A., after spitting on the Bush administration's efforts to secure the homeland, scoffing at the idea of individual initiatives thwarting terrorist activities, or damning the President as being a greater threat to world peace than Saddam Hussein, you need to project a semblance of patriotism, which is quite difficult when you belong to the same group that believes that the benefits of waving the American flag are outweighed by the offense it might bring to others.  It really can be a tough row to hoe.

While it is true that some of the "loyal opposition" have ostensibly jumped ship and declare they believe war is just against the madman Hussein, if you scratch the surface of most of most of them, the Liberal comes shining out.

At one end of the bell curve there are those who truly have seen the light and realize they were wrong all their lives and, whether their realization was due to Colin Powell's speech at the UN or some Divine intervention, they now see the "cowboy" George Dubya as their knight in shining armor.

Then there is the not-at-all silent majority of Liberals.  Some famous, most not, these Liberals proclaim their patriotism is exhibited by their vehement opposition to going to war against Iraq.  They see the world through multinational glasses and naturally drift to the Franco-German school of world affairs.  If "old Europe" is unafraid of the threat Saddam poses to the world, or more particularly to the United States of America, they defer to the wisdom, knowledge, and insight from either the folks who slaughtered more people in a seven year period than the plague, or the people (French) who, even after getting hit across the head with a two-by-four (the takeover of Czechoslovakia), didn't see the slaughter coming.

The American Liberal, or as they prefer, the "elite," walk a fine line in their pursuit of European acceptance (France, Germany, and, of course, the USSR, um, Russia, though they still pine for the good old days).  In order for a true Liberal to remain in good standing, they must continue to talk the party line, but they must also maintain their credibility here in the U.S.A.. 

They have to be against President Bush, and that means against everything he does, says or contemplates, and against anything that can be imagined as something he will do, say, or contemplate.  They need to be against American hegemony, expansion, or even its strengthening. 

So, you do what any other self respecting hypocrite would do--play both sides against the middle.  You are against the war, unless the war starts.  You are against the President, until he becomes Commander in Chief and not just on paper, and you deplore the vio- lence of war until the U.S.A. installs a free and democratic constitutional government in a liberated Iraq.

In effect, you have remained on the high ground, or, rather, on your high horse. You hate war.  You hate America because of its arrogance, bullying, and unfairness.  Yet, you sup- port a winner, in the event America wins on your terms, terms you can change depending on the direction in which the wind blows.

According to a February 19, 2003, article in Slate, Henry J. Aaron, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute (a bastion of Liberal ideology), is for a war against Iraq, so long as America "follows up what we all hope would be a quick victory with the determination to help stabilize the resulting political situation and support a transition to a representative government. Failure to follow up a military victory with patience and tenacity could easily convert a shortterm success into a longterm calamity."  How convenient.  He says war is good so long as everything works out ok.  Otherwise, what?  He is against it?  Talk about playing both sides. 

Then there is Eric Alterman, a columnist for The Nation (a magazine that is slightly to the Left of, well, the Left) who says, "I will support it once it begins, as a patriot, and in the belief that a quick victory will result in the most minimal loss of life, I continue to oppose its commencement."  Mr. Alterman lists a slew of reasons as to why he is against the war actually starting.  Some of the reasons listed even appear to be made with the deep and unbending conviction of the Liberal soul. 

However, if the shooting starts, all that heart felt angst goes bye-bye and Mr. Alterman waves the flag and yells "follow me boys."  Actually, still being a Liberal, he probably doesn't say "boys," but rather "people," and he doesn't really mean "follow" him, as he will no doubt be watching the action from the comfort of his living room.

To be sure, there are Liberals who, for all their idealism and aversion to reality, have determined that Saddam and his regime needs to be taken out by force. 

Then there are Liberals who simply haven't a clue, and being true to their delusions of a grander world than there is, see tyrants and threats to human existence as nothing more than the delusion of others.  The defeat and elimination of the tyrants and aggressors constitute the real "threat," rather than the tyrants and aggressors that are being de- feated and eliminated.

Most Liberals realize that war against Iraq is inevitable.  With this realization, some Liberals see a need to cover their bases, some switch sides without blinking an eye, and some stick to their idealism. 

What is important is that it really doesn't matter what Liberals do or think.  What mat- ters is what America does.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Liberals, Statists, Socialists, & Other Leftists

The Middle East & the Problem of Iraq
   Page Two    Page One

The Problem of Rogue States:
Iraq as a Case History

The Middle East & the Arabs

Islamism & Jihadism -- The Threat of Radical Islam
Page Three    Page Two    Page One

War & Peace in the Real World
   Page Two    Page One

Islamist Terrorist Attacks on the U.S.A.

Osama bin Laden & the Islamist Declaration of War
Against the U.S.A. & Western Civilization

Islamist International Terrorism &
U.S. Intelligence Agencies

U.S. National Security Strategy



Paul Walfield is a freelance writer and member of the State Bar of California, with an undergraduate degree in Psychology and post-graduate study in behavioral and analyt- ical psychology. He resided for a number of years in the small town of Houlton, Maine, and is now a California attorney. His articles appear in numerous periodicals and on numerous websites.  CONTACT INFORMATION:  Email:   paul.walfield@cox.net




Return to Top of Page

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume V, 2003


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity