THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume V, Issue # 283, November 22, 2003
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

DO WE NEED A $15 MILLION "ILLEGAL LOGGING INITIATIVE"?
By Alan Caruba

Did you know that forests cover about one-third of all the land in the United States of America? . It amounts to some 737 million acres of forests and, of that, 247 million acres (3.5%) are reserved from harvest by law or represent slow-growing woodlands unsuitable for timber production. Some 490 million acres are called timberlands, i.e., forests that can produce more than 20 cubic feet of wood per acre annually.

Even so, you might be surprised to learn that the United States of America imports more than $15 billion in wood products annually. In 2002, the value of these products was set at $15,876,388,000. This represents everything from hardwood logs and lumber to railroad ties, softwood lumber to plywood and particleboard. Lumber for “builders carpentry” represented $1,683,915,000 in 2002.

So my interest was aroused when I learned that, in July, the Bush administration had launched an “Initiative Against Illegal Logging” and the cost of that Initiative would be $15 million in taxpayers’ money.

It’s no secret the United States government is deep into the red ink these days and one would think it would be looking for ways to cut spending, but this Initiative was deemed important enough for U.S. Secretary of State, Colin L. Powell, to announce it on July 28. He noted that the World Bank estimates illegal logging costs developing nations an estimated $10-15 billion every year in lost resources and revenues. It is money, he said, “stolen from legitimate forest products businesses.”

As I read through Secretary Powell’s address, I noticed that he expressed his appreci- ation to Conservation International, a major Green organization, and the American Forest and Paper Association for their work “in demonstrating the critical importance of preserving protected forest areas.” Reading further, I learned that the U.S. govern- ment had “already entered into agreements with six countries to generate over $60 million for forest preservation.” So the total is now up to $75 million for this policy de- signed to “save” forests from proper management and use.

Now, let’s understand what we are really talking about. “Forest preservation” trans- lates as forests from which virtually no timber may be extracted. You may recall that the Greens have been trying for decades to stop any logging in the rain forests of South America, among others. And you may recall that Green logging policies just cost the State of California thousands of homes and more thousands of acres of trees burnt to cinders. The real cost of these retrogressive policies has to be calculated in the billions!

Then I noticed who’s in charge of this initiative, and this is where the whole thing be- gins to wreak of a Green agenda to insure that wood, the most sustainable, usable, and recyclable product on the face of the Earth, will remain yet another natural resource the Greens want to deny everyone.

The man in charge of this Initiative is John F. Turner, and he was appointed the U.S. State Department’s Assistant Secretary in charge of the Bureau of Oceans and Inter- national Environment and Scientific Affairs. Guess what? Prior to his appointment in November, 2001, Mr. Turner was the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Conservation Fund, described as a “nonprofit organization dedicated to public-private partnerships to protect land and water resources.”

Let me translate for you. This organization, like so many comparable Green groups, is the enemy of private property. Like so many Green groups, its agenda is to insure that as much land as possible is taken off the revenue producing rolls. During Mr. Turner’s tenure, his organization “protected” 2.8 million acres of parks, wildlife habitat, and open space across America.

That’s 2.8 million acres that cannot be used for housing our growing population, for timber production, hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, or off-road use of any kind. And it gets better, Mr. Turner, from 1989 to 1993, was the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service, where, among his duties, “he was responsible for expanding collaborative approaches under the Endangered Species Act, increasing wetland protection and es- tablishing 55 new National Wildlife Refuges, the most of any administration in the na- tion’s history.” Why is this necessary? It’s not. The total amount of developed land in the U.S.A. amounts to barely 3.5% of the entire landmass. The U.S. government al- ready controls upwards of 40% of the landmass.

So, the Bush Initiative on Illegal Logging begins to look more and more like the ful- fillment of the deepest held wish of every diehard environmentalist, the destruction of the nation’s economy by shutting off access to our natural resources and the denial of access to our nation’s forests in the name of protecting socalled endangered species.

And even the American Forest & Paper Association speaks the Green line, saying, “All forest enterprises worldwide should implement sustainable forest management before the next World Forestry Congress.” A more accurate translation of “sustain- able” is the means by which the use of forests and other natural resources is restrained and regulated in every way possible to insure it goes unused!

Even giant forest product conglomerates like the Weyerhaeuser Company with sales of $18.5 billion in 2002 and offices or operations in 18 countries benefit from the taxpay- ers’ underwriting of the administration’s $15 million Initiative. It increases the difficul- ties of smaller lumber import companies to compete. This is good news for Weyer- haeuser’s bottom line, but not for the many wood-importing companies who contract with local producers around the world.

This brings us at last to the question of how such illegal timber activities could exist without the compliance of the nations in regions such as the Congo Basin, the Amazon Basin and Central America, and South and Southeast Asia? The answer to that is “corruption.”

None of the wood being exported from countries such as Indonesia or Brazil just shows up at the harbor and gets secretly loaded on ships. Someone has to certify it as legal for export. The Initiative is going to throw $15 million U.S. taxpayer’s money at an effort that corrupt forest product authorities in nations around the world will render meaningless. Still think it’s worth the cost? Think “drug trade.”

Lastly, it should be noted that there are already scores of international laws, rules, and regulations regarding the export and import of wood. This Initiative fulfills the dreams of every environmentalist who hates capitalism and the free market.

More on Policy Issues Relating to
Energy, Environment, & Natural Resources



Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, Communications Director of the American Policy Center, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly column, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center (www.anxietycenter.com). A compilation of his past col- umns, entitled Warning Signs, is published by Merril Press. In addition to Warning Signs, Caruba is the author of A Pocket Guide to Militant Islam and The United Na- tions vs. the United States, both of which are available from the National Anxiety Center, 9 Brookside Road, Maplewood, New Jersey, 07040.


Copyright 2003 Alan Caruba


Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com




Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Volume V, 2003


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * Foreign Policy, U.S.
France * Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS

POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE

Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy

INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis

Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor

Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues


Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity