THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA

An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume VI, Issue # 31, February 12, 2004
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
Home Page   Main Menu   Recent Articles   Site Map   Website Index   Issues & Controversies
  Cyberland University   Political Science, Philosophy, & History: Lectures   U.S. Constitution
  American Constitutional Law   American Constitutional System   American Political System
  Conservatism, Liberalism, & Radicalism   How America Goes to War
  World War IV: Islamist Terror War Against the U.S.A. & the West

THE "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND" PROGRAM:
IMPOVERISHING EVERYONE & EDUCATING NO ONE
By Alan Caruba

Want your child to earn a salary equal to or more than the governor of your state? Want your child to be sought after by districts all over the nation offering all kinds of financial perks? Want your child to hold a job where failure to achieve any real improvement in the actual product, a student prepared to enter the workplace, has no affect on their job security?

Then put your child on a career path to be in the field of education, where he or she can rise to become the supervisor of a school district! Why? Because, not only has the Bush administration backed a program, “No Child Left Behind”, created by the leader of the Liberal wing of the Democratic Party, Teddy Kennedy, but he signed a bill that throws $49 billion at it. It mandates annual testing via a national program of standards for all public school students in grades 3 through 8. It requires “steady progress” for each minority group in our nation’s schools, as well as for “special education” students. It requires “reorganizing” any school that fails to meet these mandates.

And the entire “No Child Left Behind” program is managed from Washington, D.C. Your local school board has diddlysquat to say about your local school’s curriculum or standards. Neither does your state school board. The education of today’s children is entirely controlled by the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, two labor unions that have a chokehold on the U.S. Department of Education. Both unions will tell you they are entirely dedicated to students, but they are both entirely dedicated to higher salaries for teachers and administrators.

As I am frequently wont to say, the word “education” does not appear anywhere in the U.S. Constitution. The Founders of this nation understood that education was best served at the local level and somehow, prior to around the midpoint of the last century, America’s local public schools managed to turn out students so well educated they created the world’s greatest economy, most powerful agricultural system, a constant stream of technological advances, and what is arguably the most effective military fighting force on the face of the earth.

Indeed, a 2000 federal court decision says, “The right to an education is not guaranteed, either explicitly or implicitly, by the [U.S.] Constitution, and therefore could not constitute a fundamental right.” In short, education is not the prerogative, nor the job, of the federal government and never has been. Throughout our history, public education has always been seen as the job of local government. An American tradition, its value was recognized in rural communities and in cities from the very earliest days of settlement.

This began to change with the establishment of standardized college entrance exams. Curriculums began to serve the designers of these tests, and educational bureaucrats began to enforce a curriculum tied to them. Since the 1960s, however, the deliberate “dumbing down” of the educational system has consistently produced an annual crop of students who are deficient in their knowledge of history, civics, geography, science, and other topics about which students in other nations, when tested, consistently score higher grades. In short, America’s students, thanks to a system engineered by the NEA and AFT, have long since been “left behind.”

What else can you expect from a system that prefers “new” math to memorizing multiplication tables and encourages student to spell words any way they want? This is not to say that children don’t want to learn, but when you’re busy being taught that all cultures are the same and equal, getting in line to be drug-tested or being required to take a mind-altering drug for being “too active,” you tend not to learn the fundamentals of reading, writing and arithmetic, while, at the same time, learning a great deal about “self-esteem.” This is an educational system that has been so strongly politicized it no longer reflects the real world.

For the record, every single one of the contenders for the Democratic Party's nomination as its candidate in the coming November presidential election supported “Leave No Child Behind” and most called for throwing even more money at this effort to “improve” education by testing, testing, and testing.

The NCLB program, no matter how lavishly it is funded and no matter how many tests are given under it, will fail miserably to bring about an improvement in education provided by America's public schools. No, education is improved by letting teachers teach, teach, and teach. They cannot do that if they must wear an educational straightjacket tied to goals set, not by a local school board, but by federal government educrats. The term for the teaching method that is the centerpiece of NCLB is “teaching to the test.” And any school administrator, classroom teacher, or university professor of teacher education who is worth his salt knows and will you that "teaching to the test" is a very poor, unsound, and ineffective teaching practice.

So, while taxpayers can look forward to ever-rising property taxes to underwrite ever-rising salaries and other school expenditures, the children in America’s schools can look forward to learning less and less of practical, necessary value for the conduct of their lives.

Instead of science or social studies, they learn that all of the rain forests are disappearing or that there’s no place left for garbage or that the air and water is unsafe. They learn that the members of some African tribe residing in mud huts are living “close to Nature” because they don’t have electricity or can't use DDT to protect themselves against Malaria. Or that all the glaciers are melting. They learn that the Founding Fathers were slaveholders and that Christopher Columbus’ greatest achievement was the spread of disease to indigenous Indian tribes. They learn Socialism, disarmament, radical environmentalism, and to avoid making any kind of moral or ethical judgment. Little wonder that home schooling is one of the fastest growing trends in America today!

And it’s going to get worse. The Bush administration has begun issuing grants to help spread a United Nations-sponsored school program that aims to become a “universal curriculum” for teaching “global citizenship, peace studies, and equality of world cultures”!

As my friend, Henry Lamb, an expert on the United Nations, points out, “No longer are American children learning about the structure of a federal republic compared to a parliamentary democracy. No longer are children learning the difference between capitalism and socialism. No longer are children being taught why the United States of America became the most powerful economic engine the world has ever known. Instead, they are being taught that, with less than 5% of the world’s population, the U.S.A. uses 25% of the world’s resources and produces 25% of the world’s pollution. They are being taught that the U.S.A. is the #1 terrorist nation. They are being taught that the rest of the world is mired in poverty because of the greedy capitalists in the United States.”

That’s right. Your child and future students in American schools will be taught that being a citizen of the world is more important than being an American citizen. The curriculum is “a set of culturally neutral universal values to which all people aspire,” based on human rights, equality of the sexes, and “open-mindedness to change and obligation to environmental protection and sustainable development.”

Among the things sustainable development is opposed to are cars, air conditioning, logging, bio-engineered seeds that produce crops with higher levels of vitamin content, higher yields per acre, and less need to reduce forestland for farming. Sustainable development is opposed to property rights, the keystone of capitalism. It is Socialism on steroids. This is what your child or grandchild is going to be taught because the Bush administration is pushing and any future Democratic administration will be pushing a United Nations curriculum on the schools, instead of supporting an American curriculum!

But don’t worry, Big Government, no matter who’s running it, has plans to help you put your child through college with a system of grants to pay for his or her tuition. You’re going to need those grants because the cost of today’s educational system will have made it impossible to save enough money on your own. If this sounds like a plan to wreck individual freedom, prosperity and America’s sovereignty, it is.


LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
More on Education & America's Schools

A Practical Guide to Homeschooling



Alan Caruba is a veteran business and science writer, a Public Relations Counselor, Communications Director of the American Policy Center, and Founder of the National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for information about media-driven scare campaigns. Caruba writes a weekly column, "Warning Signs," posted on the Internet website of the National Anxiety Center (www.anxietycenter.com). A compilation of his past col- umns, entitled Warning Signs, is published by Merril Press. In addition to Warning Signs, Caruba is the author of A Pocket Guide to Militant Islam and The United Na- tions vs. the United States, both of which are available from the National Anxiety Center, 9 Brookside Road, Maplewood, New Jersey, 07040.

Copyright 2004 Alan Caruba


Published with Permission of Alan Caruba
ACaruba@AOL.Com



Return to Top of Page

Go to the WEBSITE INDEX

Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume VI, 2004


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page Two


Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights, Page One


Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage

CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION




LINKS TO PARTICULAR ISSUES & SUBJECT MATTER CATEGORIES
TREATED IN THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, U.S.A.:

Africa: Black Africa * Africa: North Africa * American Government 1
American Government 2 * American Government 3 * American Government 4
American Government 5 * American Politics * Anglosphere * Arabs
Arms Control & WMD * Aztlan Separatists * Big Government
Black Africa * Bureaucracy * Canada * China * Civil Liberties * Communism
Congress, U.S. * Conservative Groups * Conservative vs. Liberal
Constitutional Law * Counterterrorism * Criminal Justice * Disloyalty * Economy
Education * Elections, U.S. * Eminent Domain * Energy & Environment
English-Speaking World * Ethnicity & Race * Europe * Europe: Jews
Family Values * Far East * Fiscal Policy, U.S. * Foreign Aid, U.S. * France
Hispanic Separatism * Hispanic Treason * Human Health * Immigration
Infrastructure, U.S. * Intelligence, U.S. * Iran * Iraq * Islamic North Africa
Islamic Threat * Islamism * Israeli vs. Arabs * Jews & Anti-Semitism
Jihad & Jihadism * Jihad Manifesto I * Jihad Manifesto II * Judges, U.S. Federal
Judicial Appointments * Judiciary, American * Latin America * Latino Separatism
Latino Treason * Lebanon * Leftists/Liberals * Legal Issues
Local Government, U.S. * Marriage & Family * Media Political Bias
Middle East: Arabs * Middle East: Iran * Middle East: Iraq * Middle East: Israel
Middle East: Lebanon * Middle East: Syria * Middle East: Tunisia
Middle East: Turkey * Militant Islam * Military Defense * Military Justice
Military Weaponry * Modern Welfare State * Morality & Decency
National Identity * National Security * Natural Resources * News Media Bias
North Africa * Patriot Act, USA * Patriotism * Political Culture * Political Ideologies
Political Parties * Political Philosophy * Politics, American * Presidency, U.S.
Private Property * Property Rights * Public Assistance * Radical Islam
Religion & America * Rogue States & WMD * Russia * Science & Ethics
Sedition & Treason * Senate, U.S. * Social Welfare Policy * South Africa
State Government, U.S. * Subsaharan Africa * Subversion * Syria * Terrorism 1
Terrorism 2 * Treason & Sedition * Tunisia * Turkey * Ukraine
UnAmerican Activity * UN & Its Agencies * USA Patriot Act * U.S. Foreign Aid
U.S. Infrastructure * U.S. Intelligence * U.S. Senate * War & Peace
Welfare Policy * WMD & Arms Control


This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics, civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.



THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic, Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues

POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.

Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs, International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests, Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy