THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Volume IX, Issue # 112, June 15, 2007
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Government Committed to & Acting in Accord with Conservative Principles
Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity
BAD INFORMATION BREEDS HARMFUL LEGISLATION:
Anti-Coal Advertising Campaign Illustrates How Corporate
& Environmental Interests Can Harm Consumers
By Paul K. Driessen
"NO MORE FILTHY COAL PLANTS": THE RECENT ANTI-COAL ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN AS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE
PROPAGANDA & MISINFORMATION THAT DRIVES MOST U.S. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INITIATIVES --
SELF-SERVING & MISLEADING "INFORMATION" INTENDED TO INFLUENCE THE U.S.
CONGRESS & PRESSURE IT INTO ENACTING INTO LAW UNWISE & HARMFUL ENERGY POLICIES, POLICIES THAT WOULD
RESULT IN EVER-INCREASING ENERGY PRICES & ILL SERVE AMERICA'S ENERGY, ECONOMIC, & ENVIRONMENTAL FUTURE --
CLEARHEADED ANALYSIS & ACCURATE INFORMATION ESSENTIAL TO PREVENTING NARROW POLITICAL & ECONOMIC
INTERESTS FROM DOMINATING CONGRESS & RUNNING ROUGHSHOD OVER AMERICAN CONSUMERS
FULL STORY:
As Congress continues to deliberate energy and global warming bills, President Bush’s new climate initiative has altered
the debate, at least at the international level. Clearheaded analysis and accurate information is essential. Without it,
narrow political and economic interests could run roughshod over consumers.
The recent “Coal is filthy” ad campaign underscores this danger. Featuring misleading claims about pollution from
coal-fired electrical generating plants, it urged citizens to tell government officials, “No more filthy coal plants.”
But the Coalition pushing the ad campaign wasn’t another gaggle of environmental pressure groups, like those listed on
its CleanSkyCoalition.com website. The Coalition was a cabal of natural gas companies, led by Chesapeake Energy of
Oklahoma. Their goal wasn’t helping Americans get “clean skies” and “live longer.” It was fattening corporate wallets.
The cabal hoped new laws would make it harder to build more coal plants, or retrofit old ones to meet tougher air quality
standards. Utilities would have to switch to natural gas, supplies would tighten, prices would surge, and Coalition
partners would get rich.
Every $1 increase in natural gas prices costs U.S. consumers another $22 billion a year for heating, air-conditioning, food,
consumer goods and services – many of which use gas for energy or raw materials – says the Energy Information
Administration. Indeed, consumers paid $140 billion more in 2006 for gas and electricity than they did in 2000 – an extra
$1900 a year for every family of four.
That hit poor families especially hard, and the U.S. manufacturing sector lost 3 million jobs.
Chesapeake has 9 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of proven gas reserves. That sounds like a lot, but U.S. demand for natural gas
has outstripped domestic production since 1985, forcing us to import the difference, largely from less than friendly
countries and in competition with other nations. Substituting gas for coal-fired electricity would exacerbate these
problems.
Geologists say the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf could contain 420 Tcf – enough to meet current demand for 15 years. But
over 85% of these areas are off limits to drilling. Onshore gas resources face similar obstacles. And eco-purists -- political
environmentalists, i.e., environmentalist ideologues with a political agenda -- want to keep it that way.
Electricity provides 40% of the energy we use, and the United States will need 100,000 megawatts of new electricity by 2020,
according to analysts. Conservation and efficiency programs would reduce demand somewhat. But growth in population
and technologies that use electricity mean we will need every available source: gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind, biofuels
and waste-to-energy, as well as coal. Right now, coal generates half of our electricity, and there are no viable alternatives in
the near term.
The ads and environmentalist group websites say coal-fired power plants are responsible for scary-sounding amounts of air
pollution. The facts tell a different story.
Between 1970 and 2004, the U.S. population grew by 40%; its Gross Domestic Product by 187%; miles traveled by 171%;
electricity consumption by 115%; and coal burning by 80 percent. And yet, during this period, aggregate air pollution was
cut in half, thanks to improved efficiency and pollution control, air quality expert Joel Schwartz points out. New rules require
large additional reductions over the coming years that will eliminate most remaining power plant emissions by 2017.
Coal-fired power plants are now the primary source of U.S. mercury emissions, not because their emissions are large, but
because the real sources -- incinerating wastes and processing ores containing mercury -- have been eliminated. America
now accounts for only 2% of global mercury emissions, and new Environmental Protection Agency rules require a further
70% reduction from power plants over the next decade, Schwartz says.
Total air pollution now poses no significant health risks, even for children. (Asthma rates have risen as air pollution fell, so
pollution cannot be a factor.) Moreover, coal-generated electricity costs much less per kilowatt hour than alternatives,
leaving families with more money for nutrition and healthcare.
In 1900, the world supported 56 billion human life years, notes climatologist John Christy: 1.6 billion people times a 35-year
average life span. Today it supports 429 billion life years: 6.5 billion people times a 66-year average life span, and they live
far better than anyone in history.
The reason: energy, primarily fossil fuels. And, in exchange for this incredible progress – if fossil fuels really are the primary
cause of global warming – we have had a net increase in average global temperature, over the past 100 years, of about 1
degree F. (As a percentage of Earth’s atmosphere, carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. coal-fired power plants equal the
thickness of a single human hair on a football field.)
The Kyoto Protocol would compel the United States to slash CO2 emissions over 20% by 2012 – to reduce average global
temperature increases by 0.2 degrees F by 2050. Current congressional bills would bring even fewer environmental benefits.
If the pervasive misinformation exemplified by the Chesapeake ad campaign is used to justify global warming legislation,
Congress may well enact something like the Sanders-Boxer bill, which a new MIT study says would impose a tax-equivalent
of $4,500 annually on every family of four by 2015.
These congressional experiments on constituents – mandates, cap-and-trade, and other pork-laden bills – must be corrected
before real damage is done.
© 2006 Paul K. Driessen
LINKS TO RELATED TOPICS:
Political Environmentalism Versus Human Progress & Prosperity:
Policy Issues Relating to Energy, Environment,
& Natural Resources
Political Economy -- Philosophies, Systems, & Public Policies:
Government, the Economy, & Economic Prosperity
Paul K. Driessen is Senior Policy Advisor for the Congress of Racial Equality, the Committee for A Constructive Tomorrow, and the
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise. Driessen is author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, which can be
obtained at www.Eco-Imperialism.com. Email: pdriessen@cox.net --- Telephone:
(703) 698-6171
Return to Top of Page
Go to the WEBSITE INDEX
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Public Issues & Political Controversies
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
Most Recent Articles
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Volume IX, 2007
Return to Beginning of
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA,
Subject Matter Highlights
Return to POLITICAL EDUCATION Homepage
CONTACT & ACCESS INFORMATION
This is not a commercial website. The sole purpose of the website is to share with interested persons information regarding civics,
civic and social education, political science, government, politics, law, constitutional law and history, public policy, and political
philosophy and history, as well as current and recent political developments, public issues, and political controversies.
POLITICAL EDUCATION, CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
POLITICS, SOCIETY, & THE SOVEREIGN STATE
Website of Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr.
Government, Politics, Public Policy, Legal Issues, Constitutional Law, Government & the Economy, Cultural Values, Foreign Affairs,
International Relations, Military Defense & National Security, Geopolitics, Terrorism & Homeland Security, American National Interests,
Political Systems & Processes, Political Institutions, Political Ideologies, & Political Philosophy
INDEX FOR THE ENTIRE WEBSITE
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, USA
An Online Journal of Political Commentary & Analysis
Dr. Almon Leroy Way, Jr., Editor
Conservative & Free-Market Analysis of Government, Politics & Public Policy, Covering Political, Legal, Constitutional, Economic,
Cultural, Military, International, Strategic, & Geopolitical Issues
Conservative Government Ensures a Nation's Strength, Progress, & Prosperity