LIBERALISM, THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, & JUDICIAL TYRANNY:  THE SUPREME COURT'S CONTINUING USURPATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTIONS OF CONGRESS -- UNDERMINING CONSTITUTIONALISM, THE RULE OF LAW, SEPARATION OF POWERS, CHECKS & BALANCES, & THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE OF GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTABILITY -- BREACHING THE CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS TO UNLIMITED GOVERNMENTAL POWER & UNACCOUNTABLE GOVERNING PRACTICES -- WHITTLING AWAY CIVIL LIBERTIES GUARANTEES & THE RESERVED POWERS OF THE STATES -- HOW THE SUPREME COURT CAN BE CHECKED & RESTRAINED -- WHAT CONGRESS CAN DO TO SAFEGUARD AMERICA AGAINST JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP

LIBERALISM, CONSERVATISM, & THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN NATION:  PRESIDENTIAL & CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS, REPUBLICAN HOPES FOR VICTORY IN 2008, & THE NEED TO DEMONSTRATE A STARK & DEFINING CONTRAST BETWEEN THE INCREASINGLY LIBERAL LEFTIST IDEOLOGY & POLICY AGENDA OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY & A STRONG & UNBENDING CONSERVATIVE RIGHTIST STANCE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY -- THE NEED FOR A SUPERHAWK REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT & A CONGRESSIONAL MAJORITY THAT WILL SUPPORT HIS ADMINISTRATION IN SECURING AMERICA'S BORDERS AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION & TERRORIST INFILTRATION, AS WELL AS IN EFFECTIVELY PROSECUTING THE WAR AGAINST ISLAMIST TERRORISM -- THE NEED FOR A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENCY & SENATE MAJORITY THAT WILL CONTINUE TO FILL FEDERAL COURT VACANCIES WITH JUDGES WHO ADHERE TO & DECIDE CASES IN ACCORD WITH THE TRUE PRINCIPLES OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, REJECTING THE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OF LEFTWING LIBERALS SEEKING TO OBLITERATE THE BOUNDARIES OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER ESTABLISHED BY THE CONSTITUTION

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM, HUMAN RIGHTS, & THE WAR ON ISLAMIST TERRORISM: THE INHERENT WEAKNESSES OF HUMAN NATURE & THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF OPERATING ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT HUMAN RIGHTS ARE THE PRODUCT OF GOVERNMENTAL BENEVOLENCE, RATHER THAN GOD-GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES LIMITING THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT & PROTECTING THE INDIVIDUAL & SOCIETY AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL TYRANNY -- THE MOST RECENT ABOMINABLE & FLAGRANTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL DECISION RENDERED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -- DELIBERATELY MISINTERPRETING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & INVOKING "INTERNATIONAL LAW" IN ORDER TO SIDESTEP U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THE SUPREME COURT'S JURISDICTION & TO THWART A HISTORICALLY LEGITIMATE PROCEDURE BY WHICH THE U.S.A. CAN DEAL WITH ENEMY COMBATANTS OF A PARTICULARLY DESPICABLE & DANGEROUS NATURE

THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM VERSUS LEFTWING LIBERALISM & JUDICIAL ACTIVISM:  PROPOSED CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO PROTECT AMERICA'S CONSTIRUTIONAL FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC AGAINST LEFTIST LIBERAL ACTIVIST FEDERAL JUDGES WHO ABUSE THE JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, SEEKING TO UNDERMINE & DESTROY OUR GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM, CENTRALIZE POLITICAL POWER, & IMPOSE ON AMERICAN SOCIETY THEIR OWN PUBLIC POLICY PREFERENCES OR THOSE OF RADICAL ACTIVIST SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS

U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON JUDGE SAMUEL A. ALITO, NOMINATED BY PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH FOR APPOINTMENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT:  JUDGE ALITO'S RUNNING THE GAUNTLET THROWN DOWN BY PARTISAN DEMOCRATIC INGUISITORS ASKING GRUELING QUESTIONS & MAKING POLITICALLY BIASED PRONOUNCEMENTS EXPRESSING THEIR OWN LIBERAL LEFTIST NOTIONS REGARDING ISSUES OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE AMERICAN SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT

WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE UPCOMING BATTLE OVER U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF SAMUEL ALITO'S NOMINATION TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT: WHETHER AMERICA'S BROKEN LEGAL SYSTEM WILL EVER BE REPAIRED & TRUE JUSTICE RE-ESTABLISHED IN AMERICA -- ALITO'S JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY:  ONE OF DEFERENCE TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AS AN ABSOLUTE STANDARD -- WHY LIBERALS OPPOSE ALITO'S CONFIRMATION:  THEIR FEAR THAT MUCH OF THE LIBERAL PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA WILL BE RELEGATED TO THE BALLOT BOX, WHERE IT VERY LIKELY WILL BE DEFEATED

THE TRUE SOURCE & NATURE OF THE BASIC RIGHTS OF AMERICANS:  CIVIL LIBERTIES RECOGNIZED, OBSERVED, & PROTECTED BY OUR CONSTITUTION & SYSTEM OF LAWS, WHICH PLACE STRICT LIMITS ON GOVERNMENTAL POWER IN ORDER TO PREVENT GOVERNMENT FROM INTERFERING WITH NATURAL RIGHTS THAT ARE INHERENT IN THE HUMAN CONSITION -- THE DANGER OF ABANDONING THE CONCEPT OF GOD-GIVEN INALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF THE CONCEPT OF RIGHTS AS GIFTS HANDED DOWN FROM GOVERNMENT TO THE PEOPLE:  WHAT GOVERNMENT GIVES TO THE PEOPLE, GOVERNMENT CAN TAKE AWAY

THE PRESIDENT & THE JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS:  PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S NOMINATION OF SAMUEL ALITO FOR APPOINTMENT TO A VACANCY ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -- RALLYING AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES & BOLSTERING THE CONCEPT OF A SUPREME COURT WHOSE ULTIMATE PURPOSE IS TO UPHOLD & DEFEND THE INTEGRITY OF THE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN & AS PROPERLY AMENDED -- PROTECTING & PRESERVING THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

THE BASIC POLITICAL THEORY & FUNDAMENTAL LAW UNDERLYING THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC:  RULE BASED ON THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED & THE TRUE DEFINITION OF BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CONTAINED IN THE CITIZENSHIP CLAUSE IN THE FOURTEENTH ARTICLE OF AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

THE INTERNATIONAL DEMOCRATIC UNION & ITS ADVOCACY OF FABIAN SOCIALISM & MAJORITARIAN DICTATORSHIP:   HOW THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE IDU DIFFERS FROM THE FUNDAMENTAL GOVERNING PRINCIPLES STATED IN THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, EMBODIED IN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, & UNDERLYING AMERICA'S CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC

PRIVATE PROPERTY IN THE U.S.A.:  THE PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF AMERICANS UNDER THE FEDERAL & STATE CONSTITUTIONS --THE NEED FOR CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION TO PROTECT PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS AGAINST THE PRACTICES OF PARTICULAR STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENTS & AGAINST THE DANGEROUSLY EXPANSIVE INTERPRETATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN UPHELD BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF KELO V. CITY OF NEW LONDON (2005) & READ BY THE COURT INTO U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

THE FREEDOM21 SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE & THE CALL TO BATTLE IN DEFENSE OF LIBERTY: CALLING ON CONSERVATIVE & LIBERTARIAN GROUPS TO UNITE IN ACTIVE PURSUIT OF AN EFFECTIVE STRATEGY TO REVITALIZE THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL REPUBLIC & DEFEAT THE FORCES THAT ARE DETERMINED TO DESTROY CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT & PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE U.S.A. -- URGING CONSERVATIVES & LIBERTARIANS TO DEMOCRATICALLY TAKE CONTROL OF AMERICA'S STATE & LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT & UTILIZE THEM IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ELITISM, AUTHORITARIANISM, GLOBALISM, STATISM, SOCIALISM, & POLITICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM

JUDICIAL RESTRAINT & CONSERVATISM VERSUS JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & LIBERALISM:  THE RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING CONTROVERSY OVER THE PROPER MAKEUP OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IN GENERAL & THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN PARTICULAR -- THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED ROLE OF THE U.S. COURTS:  INTERPRETATION & APPLICATION OF EXISTING U.S. LAW IN LEGAL CASES & CONTROVERSIES COMING BEFORE THE COURTS -- JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING & DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC POLICY AS A USURPATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF CONGRESS & THE STATES & A VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT:  PERSONAL HONESTY & INTEGRITY, KNOWLEDGE OF & ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, & DETERMINATION TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED & WRITTEN

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION & THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF AMERICANS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION:  AN ASSAULT REFLECTED IN THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN KELO VERSUS CITY OF NEW LONDON -- HOW THE KELO DECISION TIES IN WITH THE UNITED NATIONS, "INTERNATIONAL LAW," AGENDA 21, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, STATISM, AUTHORITARIANISM, & POLITICAL CORRUPTION -- WHY AMERICA'S FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD BE OUTRAGED TO LEARN OF THIS PERFIDIOUS & REPREHENSIBLE JUDICIAL DECISION GROSSLY DISTORTING THE MEANING OF THE TAKINGS CLAUSE IN THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

JUDICIAL DESTRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:  DECIMATION OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES BY AMORAL, LEFTWING LIBERAL JUSTICES ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT -- THE LATEST RASH OF OUTRAGEOUS U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS:  DEMONSTRATION THAT THOSE AT THE APEX OF POWER IN THE U.S.A. ARE WELL ON THE WAY TO DESTROYING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, ASSUMING DICTATORIAL CONTROL OVER THE AMERICAN POPULATION, & TRAMPLING THE LONG-STANDING RIGHTS OF U.S. CITIZENS

THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY & RESPONSIBILITY OF CONGRESS TO ENACT LEGISLATION THAT WOULD PREVENT ACTIVIST FEDERAL JUDGES FROM USING A FLAWED INTERPRETATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO REWRITE THE LAWS & TRADITIONS GOVERNING MARRIAGE:  THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO PASS THE PROPOSED MARRIAGE PROTECTION ACT & THEREBY STAND AGAINST DESTRUCTIVE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM & FOR TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE

UNBRIDLED JUDICIAL ACTIVISM:  ACTIVIST FEDERAL JUDGES IGNORING THE CONSTITUTION & LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES & DECIDING LEGAL CASES & CONTROVERSIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JUDGES' OWN PERSONAL POLITICAL VIEWS & PUBLIC POLICY PREFERENCES, THEREBY USURPING THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION & MAKING LAW, RATHER THAN INTERPRETING & APPLYING EXISTING LAW -- THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL LEFT'S INCREASING USE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY TO DO IN COURT WHAT IT CANNOT DO AT THE BALLOT BOX OR IN CONGRESS & THE STATE LEGISLATURES:  ADVANCE AN ULTRA-LIBERAL, ACTIVIST, SECULAR, MULTICULTURAL POLITICAL AGENDA WHICH MOST AMERICANS OPPOSE -- HIGH TIME FOR CONGRESS TO REASSERT ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DEFINE & RESTRICT THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL COURTS, INCLUDING THAT OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT -- THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO BEGIN IMPEACHING & REMOVING FROM OFFICE FEDERAL JUDGES WHO DO NOT FOLLOW THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

UNRESTRAINED GOVERNMENT BY AN OUT-OF-CONTROL FEDERAL JUDICIARY:  A JUDICIARY THAT IS DESTROYING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AMERICA'S CONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL REPUBLIC, OUR SYSTEM OF LIMITED, DIVIDED & BALANCED GOVERNMENTAL POWER, & THE POLITICAL AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER-STATES OF THE AMERICAN FEDERAL UNION -- THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO LIMIT THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, AS WELL AS THE JURISDICTION OF THE LOWER FEDERAL COURTS

THE LATEST BRAND OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM:  ACTIVIST U.S. FEDERAL JUDGES CONSIDERING & USING FOREIGN & INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SOURCES WHEN DECIDING CASES, EVEN THOUGH SUCH SOURCES OFTEN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTITUTION & LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES -- THE NEED FOR CONGRESS TO EXERCISE ITS CONSTITUTIONAL POWER OVER THE FEDERAL COURTS & SEND FEDERAL JUDGES A STRONG MESSAGE THAT AMERICANS WILL BE GOVERNED BY AMERICAN LAWS ONLY & THAT JUDGES WHO VIOLATE THEIR OATH OF OFFICE WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE FEDERAL BENCH

THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, NATURAL-RIGHTS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, & U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS -- THE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICE'S ADHERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL MEANING & INTENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION & HIS USE OF NATURAL-LAW & NATURAL-RIGHTS PHILOSOPHY TO DEFEND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT:  THE GREATEST THREAT TO THE ENDEAVOR OF THE POLITICAL LEFT TO REPLACE AMERICA'S TRADITIONAL SYSTEM OF LIMITED GOVERNMENT WITH A FULL-BLOWN REGULATORY-WELFARE STATE OF UNLIMITED POWERS

THE POLITICAL CONTROVERSY OVER APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES TO FILL VACANCIES ON THE U.S. COURTS:  THE CONTINUING BATTLE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVES SEEKING A FEDERAL JUDICIARY THAT INTERPRETS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT THE CONSTITUTION ACTUALLT SAYS & LEFTWING LIBERALS DEMANDING THE APPOINTMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES WHO ARE COMMITTED TO THE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY & RADICAL PUBLIC POLICY AGENDA OF LEFTWING LIBERALISM & ARE DETERMINED TO MAKE FUNDAMENTAL LAW THROUGH JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION, READING THEIR OWN IDEOLOGICAL NOTIONS & POLICY PREFERENCES INTO THE COUNSTITUTION & DESTROYING GENUINE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT IN THE PROCESS

JUDGE ROY MOORE'S COMMENTS ON SEPARATION OF CHURCH & STATE, FREEDOM OF RELIGION, & THE RIGHTS & LIBERTIES OF AMERICANS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:  ALAN CARUBA'S REPORT FROM THE FIFTH ANNUAL FREEDOM21 CONFERENCE

THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPERNDENCE:  A BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE SOCIAL COMPACT THEORY OF JOHN LOCKE & THOMAS JEFFERSON -- THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY EMPLOYED BY AMERICA'S FOUNDING FATHERS TO JUSTIFY THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION & THE FOUNDING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

UNDER THE CONSTITUTION & LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO CLAIM AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP?  DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EXPRESSION "ALL PERSONS ... BORN IN THE UNITED STATES" INCLUDE A PERSON BORN TO FOREIGN NATIONALS WHO HAPPENED TO BE IN THE U.S.A. AT THE TIME OF THEIR CHILD'S BIRTH?  DOES SUCH A PERSON HAVE A LEGITIMATE CLAIM TO THE LEGAL STATUS OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES?  QUESTIONS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT MAY SOON CONSIDER & ANSWER.

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP -- THE CASE OF YASSER HAMDI V. RUMSFELD:  AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT TO RECONSIDER & CORRECT A PROFOUND ERROR IT MADE MORE THAN A CENTURY AGO IN INTERPRETING THE CILIZENSHIP CLAUSE IN THE FOURTEENTH ARTICLE OF AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

AMERICA'S COURTS & THE RAVAGES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM:  HIGH TIME FOR AMERICANS TO BEGIN HOLDING THEIR JUDGES TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON THEIR AUTHORITY & TO SOME STANDARD OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THEIR OFFICIAL ACTIONS & DECISIONS

THE ASSAULT ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION -- CUTTING THE HEART OUT OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH:  A DISSENTING OPINION IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE OF MCCONNELL VERSUS FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION, DECEMBER 10, 2003

SOCIAL COMPACT THEORY -- THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC:  THE THEORY AS EXPOUNDED BY THE ENGLISHMAN JOHN LOCKE & AS EXPRESSED BY THOMAS JEFFERSON IN THE AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF AMERICANS TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH & FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY -- TWO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS THREATENED BY GOVERNMENTAL ATTEMPTS TO ENFORCE "POLITICALLY CORRECT" ATTITUDES & BELIEFS:  THE FIRST AMENDMENT VERSUS GOVERNMENT-ENFORCED "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS"

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, POLITICAL STABILITY, & THE GOVERNMENT OF A FREE PEOPLE -- CONSERVATISM, CONSTITUTIONALISM, & THE POLITICS OF PRUDENCE:  THE VALUE OF PRACTICAL WISDOM IN PROVIDING A CONSTITUTION FOR & GOVERNING A DEMOCRATIC POLITY

THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY UNDERLYING THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM -- HOW JAMES MADISON & THE OTHER FRAMERS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION SOUGHT TO PREVENT ARBITRARY, TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT & ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS & LIBERTIES OF AMERICANS

HOW THE COURTS OF OUR LAND SHOULD INTERPRET THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION -- JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH WHAT THE PROVISION WAS GENERALLY UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN AT THE TIME IT WAS ADOPTED:  THE THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION HELD BY SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA

RELIGION & PUBLIC LIFE IN AMERICA:  TO ENFORCE THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, MUST WE BAN ALL PUBLIC EXPRESSION OF RELIGIOUS FAITH?  ARE ATHEISTS. AGNOSTICS, & OTHER NON-BELIEVERS USING THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE TO DESTROY THE FIRST AMENDMENT GUARANTEE OF THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS SPEECH?  DID THE AMERICAN FOUNDING FATHERS ENVISION THE U.S.A. AS A GODLESS STATE, HOSTILE TO RELIGION & SUPPRESSING ALL EXPRESSION OF RELIGIOUS FAITH?

THE PRESENT MAJORITY ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT & ITS INTENTION TO INCORPORATE BY JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION SIGNIFICANT PARTS OF EUROPEAN LAW INTO AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- SHOULD WE ALLOW THESE LIBERAL LEFTIST JUSTICES TO RADICALLY TRANSFORM & EUROPEANIZE THE SUPREME LAW OF OUR LAND?

WHY U.S. SENATE CONFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES, COUPLED WITH PARTISAN USE OF THE FILIBUSTER TO PREVENT REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS FROM CHOOSING CONSERVATIVE FEDERAL JUDGES, IS A PROCESS THAT IS BROKEN & NEEDS TO BE FIXED

LEFTIST POLITICAL THINKING VERSUS RIGHTIST POLITICAL THINKING REVISITED -- ONE EXPLANATION OF WHY THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL LEFT & THE POLITICAL RIGHT IN THE U.S.A. CANNOT BE RECCONCILED:  ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES CONSIDERED

LEFTIST POLITICAL THINKING VERSUS RIGHTIST POLITICAL THINKING -- ONE EXPLANATION OF WHY THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL LEFT & THE POLITICAL RIGHT IN THE U.S.A. CANNOT BE RECONCILED